From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 10 12:52:34 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A4E37B487 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 12:52:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB8C43FAF for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 12:52:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (port757.uc1-esp.isdn-lan.cybercity.dk [212.242.98.245]) by phk.freebsd.dk (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h6AJqHV3068211; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:52:17 GMT (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6AJqETC003771; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 21:52:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: Bosko Milekic From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 10 Jul 2003 15:37:34 -0000." <20030710153734.GA1101@technokratis.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 21:52:14 +0200 Message-ID: <3770.1057866734@critter.freebsd.dk> cc: Mike Silbersack cc: "Alan L. Cox" cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: David Schultz cc: Don Lewis cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern subr_param.c sys_pipe.c src/sys/sys pipe.h X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:52:35 -0000 In message <20030710153734.GA1101@technokratis.com>, Bosko Milekic writes: > With the recent bug reporting regarding kmem_map being too small > coming in, I'd have to say that I agree with that assertion. Address > space has become more expensive than memory, at least on ia32, and > it's gotten to the point where we need to re-evaluate some of our > autosizing and max size constants (for example, see VM_KMEM_SIZE_MAX). I have set my cross-hair on struct buf (including sbufs) and struct bio in this respect, they will not require permanent KVA when I'm done with them, but the time-line is 6-current not 5-stable. We may be able do some low-hanging fruit for 5-stable if we are sufficiently motivated. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.