From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 22 23:08:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CAFD1065678 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:08:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-arch@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACF38FC1F for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:08:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-arch@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MIs1a-0000t2-Tl for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:30:02 +0000 Received: from 77-22-111-166-dynip.superkabel.de ([77.22.111.166]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:30:02 +0000 Received: from ino-news by 77-22-111-166-dynip.superkabel.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:30:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org From: clemens fischer Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:05:28 +0200 Lines: 16 Message-ID: <6p45h6xbmp.ln2@nntp.spotteswoode.dnsalias.org> References: <49D1492C.5050101@freebsd.org> <200903310620.n2V6Kudd072936@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 77-22-111-166-dynip.superkabel.de X-Archive: encrypt=none Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: tin/1.9.4-20090211 ("Rieclachan") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.30-ARCH (i686)) Sender: news Subject: Re: On errno X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:08:11 -0000 On Tue-2009/03/31-08:20 Garrett Wollman wrote in gmane.os.freebsd.architechture (MID <200903310620.n2V6Kudd072936@hergotha.csail.mit.edu>): > [on strings accompanying errno] > > But all this is really irrelevant if no other operating system or > standard adopts the interface. Interfaces which are peculiar to > FreeBSD are rarely useful. plan9 already has that: programs return a string instead of a number. plan9port (user space implementation for unix) takes an empty string to mean SUCCESS and anything else as FAILURE. clemens