From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Dec 10  9:50:29 2000
From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Dec 10 09:50:28 2000
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from drama.navipath.com (drama.navipath.com [216.67.14.8])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBEBE37B400
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 09:50:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from forrie@localhost)
            by drama.navipath.com with id eBAHoQP28218
            for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 12:50:26 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 12:50:26 -0500
From: Forrest Aldrich <forrie@navipath.com>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Package installation location
Message-ID: <20001210125026.A27718@drama.navipath.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: forrie@drama.navipath.com
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Within the scope of this problem, would it not be simple to code in a
configuration diretive in the build process, such that a simple entry
in /etc/make.conf would tell the ports build where to install ($prefix)?

Then, the local admin can make that decision.. whether or not to default
to /usr/local.


_F



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message