From owner-freebsd-current  Sat May 10 11:47:20 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA15874
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 10 May 1997 11:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from X2296 (ppp6565.on.sympatico.ca [206.172.208.157])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA15869
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 10 May 1997 11:47:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (tim@localhost) by X2296 (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA00279; Sat, 10 May 1997 14:46:46 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 10 May 1997 14:46:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tim Vanderhoek <tim@X2296>
Reply-To: ac199@hwcn.org
To: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: byacc and Perl
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.95.970509170913.21050A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970510144412.195A-100000@X2296>
X-OS: FreeBSD 2.2
X-Mailer: Pine
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 9 May 1997, Michael Hancock wrote:

> Would upgrading byacc to the Perl capable version cause any uproar?  For
> example you can do:

If you want to have real fun, try the Java-capable version! :-)
(Search Yahoo for "byacc/java")


--
tIM...HOEk
Whoever told you I had a .signature was lying.