From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Feb 24 20:41:54 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id UAA05953 for current-outgoing; Fri, 24 Feb 1995 20:41:54 -0800
Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA05947 for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 1995 20:41:52 -0800
Received: (from phk@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id UAA16372 for current@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Feb 1995 20:41:16 -0800
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com>
Message-Id: <199502250441.UAA16372@ref.tfs.com>
Subject: lfs ?
To: current@FreeBSD.org
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 1995 20:41:16 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 215       
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Is it still the case that having more than one LFS on a machine is stupid ?
-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk>
TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
I am Pentium Of Borg. Division is Futile. You WILL be approximated.