From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Mar 11 11:40:05 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA03193 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 11:40:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from sax.sax.de (sax.sax.de [193.175.26.33]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA03148 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 11:39:58 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id UAA05915 for freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 20:39:56 +0100 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA02005; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 20:25:57 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <19970311202555.KX24648@uriah.heep.sax.de> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 20:25:55 +0100 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Hard Link Count too small! References: <199703110936.UAA06877@godzilla.zeta.org.au> <199703111749.KAA25596@phaeton.artisoft.com> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.60_p2-3,5,8-9 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: <199703111749.KAA25596@phaeton.artisoft.com>; from Terry Lambert on Mar 11, 1997 10:49:24 -0700 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As Terry Lambert wrote: > Yes. And this is what must be prevented. POSIX compliance must be > maintained by stable storage, ... So any system without RAID would be in danger of losing POSIX compliance under some circumstances. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)