From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Aug 26 10:39:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CEFD37B400; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:39:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wwweasel.geeksrus.net (wwweasel.geeksrus.net [64.8.210.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEF243E42; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:39:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from alane@wwweasel.geeksrus.net) Received: from wwweasel.geeksrus.net (alane@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wwweasel.geeksrus.net (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g7QHckGw064680; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 13:38:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from alane@wwweasel.geeksrus.net) Received: (from alane@localhost) by wwweasel.geeksrus.net (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7QHcdPF064154; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 13:38:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from alane) Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 13:38:39 -0400 From: Alan E To: David Yeske Cc: Trevor Johnson , alane@FreeBSD.ORG, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira , FreeBSD Ports List , Will Andrews Subject: Re: Shouldn't xmms-pipe be under audio, with all the other xmms-* plugins? Message-ID: <20020826173839.GA58144@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> Reply-To: alane@geeksrus.net References: <20020826050913.I2666-100000@blues.jpj.net> <20020826113721.95663.qmail@web13501.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020826113721.95663.qmail@web13501.mail.yahoo.com> X-message-flag: Magic 8-Ball says "Outlook not so good." I'll ask it about Exchange next. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 04:37:21AM -0700, David Yeske wrote: >There is a lot of grey area there, we have xmms plugins scattered all over the place... > >Although most of the vis plugins are under ports/graphics > >I noticed windowmaker has its own category. Should xmms have one also? x11-wm is window *manager*, if that's what you are thinking. No, it shouldn't, IMO. >xmms-pipe doesn't actually require a sound card or have anything to do with sound, and either does >xmms-alarm, although xmms-alarm is something that provides a clock that requires X... xmms-pipe does the same thing that p5-Xmms does, except via a named pipe instead of the built-in network control interface. So, best argument I can make is, aside from the one that almost all but vis are in audio, p5-Xmms, which provides analogous function, is in audio, and I think xmms-pipe should go in the same place. Besides, in case you hadn't noticed, it's done already. -- AlanE KDE-FreeBSD Team (http://freebsd.kde.org/) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message