Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 04:36:39 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> To: Yuri <yuri@freebsd.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 9204a735d9a8 - main - net/storj: update Storj programs to version 1.47.3. Message-ID: <YfDP19WqkQ6Qp4/B@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <c580cfc2-a8eb-7420-f061-f0c00fe601f4@tsoft.com> References: <202201251917.20PJHN0w064032@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <c580cfc2-a8eb-7420-f061-f0c00fe601f4@tsoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 11:31:24AM -0800, Yuri wrote: > On 1/25/22 11:17, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > net/storj: update Storj programs to version 1.47.3. > > * 'Storj' - port name repeated Only because I'm forced to prepend stupid "cat/port" patch which I strip locally when browsing commits: this information is redundant as it can be inferred from the commit itself. > * 'programs' - irrelevant info for the update. People who know it would > know that these are programs. > > * 'version' - redundant, because updates are virtually always to versions. Fair, but IMHO not enough to avoid this nice verbosity of natural language flow. :) > In the ML browser your subject got truncated and one essential part > isn't immediately displayed as a result of this redundancy: > > https://people.freebsd.org/~yuri/redundant-commit-message-information.png Your screenshot actually shows that the bug is not the commit subject, which is limited by some ~70 characters and mine do no violate that, but the From (Author) field needlessly taking too much space. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?YfDP19WqkQ6Qp4/B>