Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 02 Mar 2012 01:34:12 -0800
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: Fix nvidia-like ports, help needed
Message-ID:  <4F509414.3070605@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120228223656.GF99283@azathoth.lan>
References:  <20293.31720.350021.74506@gromit.timing.com> <20120223013502.GA78308@FreeBSD.org> <20120223072132.GB88092@azathoth.lan> <20120223093421.Horde.oN2FMZjmRSRPRfoNKQ4BA-g@webmail.leidinger.net> <d0ee88b5486535475f0c1c4bf5ecea55@etoilebsd.net> <20294.39398.620930.217619@gromit.timing.com> <20120223211406.GA14803@azathoth.lan> <4F46D751.2090100@FreeBSD.org> <20120228211513.GD99283@azathoth.lan> <4F4D44F0.9060901@FreeBSD.org> <20120228223656.GF99283@azathoth.lan>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 02/28/2012 14:36, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 01:19:44PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 2/28/2012 1:15 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>> Here is a patch to add support for includedir keyword to
>>> libmap.conf so that we
>> 
>> I think this is overly complicated, and not generally useful. It
>> also delays the utility of the solution until this gets into the
>> base.
>> 
>> What I would do instead is to incorporate an nvidia option into
>> the xorg meta-port, and separate the GL libs into a separate
>> port. If the nvidia option is checked the GL libs come from an
>> nvidia slave port. If not, they come from an xorg-server slave
>> port.
>> 
>> Or, we just keep doing what we're doing now, since it works. I'm
>> still not sure what problem we're trying to solve. :)
>> 
>> 
>> Doug
> 
> the problem we are trying to solve is to avoid having the nvidia
> drivers overwritting libGL.so.1 which break the package database
> consistency.

In that case the solution I outlined above would work, and it's hard
for me to see why it wouldn't be the best solution.


Doug

- -- 

    This .signature sanitized for your protection
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJPUJQUAAoJEFzGhvEaGryEoIYIANJ0DHtcxIRCCY85rKB/2ENQ
p8iSPhkuA99eGsbBukzhBpyivNskm10/W5XnhLy+VzuyX6UmxRfa1w+hxp7tej75
zZHrSnByb3j3iYG9MgiE/Doeo1Iwg8qknhr+W6JhVVTZQH0jM4Y3uPd4xxlLc8lT
GDhtbPWPeQMggzJdjiajQSUJBLZMMoFzXGiaetr0yyz4HwEv8IjcUSTdkZ/ixHB5
5GoVODLr5RuGCErYWLTzR2DytZ9MroJwH+iRcWNuY5w7aAG6SF5Wqytsq3RgYqga
bWUBVCtozaAah+clGR8dkyL0IC+RZxSRdoR3JqlXtfAbhZBnHuo9VYOlhLtPMIA=
=+RmT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F509414.3070605>