From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr 16 12:44:38 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7D45216A4CE; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 12:44:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0F76143D3F; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 12:44:38 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from scottl@samsco.org)
Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.254.11])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j3GClHbD063551;
	Sat, 16 Apr 2005 06:47:17 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from scottl@samsco.org)
Message-ID: <426107F4.8000107@samsco.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 06:41:24 -0600
From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050218
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org>
References: <20050415173711.I658@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
In-Reply-To: <20050415173711.I658@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed 
	version=3.0.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on pooker.samsco.org
cc: arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: De-orbitting ATM-HARP
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 12:44:38 -0000

Harti Brandt wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> not sure whether this is actually off-topic. Some time ago I asked on 
> freebsd-atm who would have a problem when we remove HARP (netatm, hfa)
> from 6. I got only two or three answers which said 'go for it'. Nobody 
> said that he would have a problem. So should we do it and when? Perhaps 
> the best time is before 6.0. That would be in the next two weeks as I 
> understand.
> 
> While there I would also remove everything from netnatm that is not 
> needed by NgATM. This is mainly the socket interface. I'm not aware of 
> any application that uses it. Any thoughts on this?
> 
> harti

Go for it