From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 31 12:34:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBEF16A4CE; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:34:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A746A43D31; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:34:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from john_m_cooper@yahoo.com) Received: from borgdemon.losaca.adelphia.net ([67.21.169.8]) by mta10.adelphia.netESMTP <20040331203426.EZOC3458.mta10.adelphia.net@borgdemon.losaca.adelphia.net>; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:34:26 -0500 Received: by borgdemon.losaca.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8920ADD8; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:34:24 -0800 (PST) From: John Merryweather Cooper To: Jeremy Messenger In-Reply-To: References: <200403310656.i2V6uS7p029577@ns1.mezzweb.com> <1080731748.648.12.camel@localhost> <1080739187.73073.28.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20040331132554.GC84869@voodoo.oberon.net> <1080756218.669.16.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1080765262.526.2.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:34:24 -0800 cc: Kirill Ponomarew cc: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Update port: www/screem 0.8.2 -> 0.10.1, repo copy www -> editors and some clean up X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 20:34:27 -0000 On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 11:59, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:03:40 -0800, John Merryweather Cooper > wrote: > > > > This is bike shed material. > > When people use the word 'bikeshed' just to cover their laziness and don't > want to fix/clean anything, IMO. > > Mezz > > > jmc > Enough said . . . I'm not opposed to a "different" scheme as long as some tells me what it is. However, I think I'm a moderate on this issue, and I suspect any attempt to comprehensively re-categorize the ports tree is going to generate considerable flames. jmc