From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 8 03:20:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044901065674 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 03:20:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E857C8FC13 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 03:20:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p583KAlv001359 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 03:20:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p583KAXB001357; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 03:20:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 03:20:10 GMT Message-Id: <201106080320.p583KAXB001357@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: Benjamin Kaduk Cc: Subject: Re: docs/157453: Fwd: Re: [maybe spam] Re: svn commit: r222702 - head/sys/sys X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Benjamin Kaduk List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 03:20:11 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/157453; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Benjamin Kaduk To: bug-followup@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: docs/157453: Fwd: Re: [maybe spam] Re: svn commit: r222702 - head/sys/sys Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 23:18:33 -0400 (EDT) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:55:44 -0700 From: Julian Elischer To: Benjamin Kaduk Subject: Re: [maybe spam] Re: svn commit: r222702 - head/sys/sys On 6/6/11 10:52 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: >> On 6/5/11 4:20 AM, Julian Elischer wrote: >> >> hmm note that my stealing of 4 bits for FIB was supposed to go away >> for 8 and beyond. > > Hmm, perhaps my patch to setfib.2 in > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=docs/157453 is not quite right, > then. Do you have any comments on it? looks good.. may add "this restriction will eventually be lifted" > > Thanks, > > Ben Kaduk > >> We need to do an mbuf redesign.. at this stage, I guess it's a project for >> 10. >