Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:52:49 -0500
From:      Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>
To:        Matthew Emmerton <matt@gsicomp.on.ca>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: 40upgrade.tgz
Message-ID:  <20010130165249.C452@puck.firepipe.net>
In-Reply-To: <007001c08b02$07cdfef0$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca>; from matt@gsicomp.on.ca on Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 04:17:19PM -0500
References:  <20010130101146.A18917@mooseriver.com> <20010130183014.72885.qmail@mail.oregonfast.net> <20010130140537.A452@puck.firepipe.net> <20010130111703.A513@mooseriver.com> <007001c08b02$07cdfef0$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--/e2eDi0V/xtL+Mc8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 04:17:19PM -0500, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> Has anyone informed the www/doc team that the link to 40upgrade.tgz is
> broken from http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html?
>=20
> I'm also a bit confused by what is discussed above.  Will makes it sound
> like a 4.0-REL system needs both 40upgrade.tgz AND 41upgrade.tgz, which to
> me doesn't sound correct - 40upgrade.tgz should move a 4.0-REL system up =
to
> 4-STABLE (as of date of downloading the upgrade kit) as far as ports are
> concerned, and not requires two upgrade kits.

Well, it is because each one takes care of two different problems.. it
is kinda tough to merge back changes and compile them on an older
system.  So.. the older the OS that the upgrade tarball targets is, the
more difficult it is to update it.  So for the most part these things
rely on binary compatibility to work.  Plus, it may not be as simple as
checking out the HEAD version of pkg_install and compiling it on a 4.0
box.. (though pkg_install/* usually works, but some other things don't).

In any case, these bootstrapping packages probably should be done
better.  IMO, the PKGORIGIN thing shouldn't be required (and to be
honest, the amount of code that the "base package tools" cover should be
much smaller, so we could just package the extra stuff like PKGORIGIN
and just tell people to upgrade their package tools).  Some things
are unavoidable.. e.g. libc and/or libc_r upgrades.  Those are much more
difficult to work around other than upgrading via buildworld...

--=20
wca

--/e2eDi0V/xtL+Mc8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6dzexF47idPgWcsURArrCAJ0epnND5Sv77j666tGjM3dmFyazLgCgmNAM
iAqt7vFhy//NQn1GGj64keg=
=uWhs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--/e2eDi0V/xtL+Mc8--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010130165249.C452>