From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Oct 25 12:17:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D8615263 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 12:17:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA06948 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 21:17:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id VAA16201 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 21:17:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EACF1521E for ; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 12:16:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from semuta.feral.com (semuta [192.67.166.70]) by feral.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA01297; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 12:16:15 -0700 Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 12:16:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: Nate Williams Cc: Warner Losh , arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Racing interrupts In-Reply-To: <199910251915.NAA14613@mt.sri.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Feh. Okay, maybe a cheapshot. Sorry. But the argument "Things are just fine the way they are and users will cope" pushes my buttons a bit... On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, Nate Williams wrote: > > > It's alot easier to use the standard FreeBSD approach to the problem. > > > "You've got broken hardware, fix it and FreeBSD will work better." :( > > > > Then FreeBSD will never be a serious server solution, and I for one would > > quit wasting my time on a Linux wannabe. > > Linux wannabe? Cheap shot, and completely uncalled for, especially > since Linux is no better at this than FreeBSD, and often-times *MUCH* > worse. > > > > Nate > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message