From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Dec 14 15:30:11 2000 From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 15:30:09 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (adsl-63-202-177-71.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.202.177.71]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33BE37B698; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 15:30:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eBENeJo01069; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 15:40:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com) Message-Id: <200012142340.eBENeJo01069@mass.osd.bsdi.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: John Baldwin Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kthread API In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:55:36 PST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 15:40:19 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I'd like to make some of the kernel API's a little more consistent as > far as in their naming. The first one I'd like to tackle is the kthread > API. Specifically, I'd like to stick the whole API under a kthread_* API. I like this. 8) -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message