From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 21 06:17:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA6B16A4CE for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 06:17:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from burka.carrier.kiev.ua (burka.carrier.kiev.ua [193.193.193.107]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD0C143D39 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 06:17:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from netch@lucky.net) Received: from netch@localhost [127.0.0.1] (netch@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by burka.carrier.kiev.ua with ESMTP id i5L6GqeV063023; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:16:56 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from netch@burka.carrier.kiev.ua) Received: (from netch@localhost) by burka.carrier.kiev.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5L6Gqah063020; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:16:52 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from netch) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:16:52 +0300 From: Valentin Nechayev To: Andriy Tkachuk Message-ID: <20040621061652.GA96079@lucky.net> References: <20040619175007.GB462@tuatara.fishballoon.org> <414787887.20040619210137@andric.com> <20040619193545.GC462@tuatara.fishballoon.org> <14210101.20040619220601@andric.com> <004401c45640$f7d73b70$5f0210ac@ranger> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <004401c45640$f7d73b70$5f0210ac@ranger> X-42: On X-Verify-Sender: verified cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /bin/ls sorting bug? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 06:17:06 -0000 Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 02:34:04, andrit wrote about "Re: /bin/ls sorting bug?": >> And AFAICS, there's no way to tell ls: "first sort on time, >> then on filename, then on size", etc. This would make a nice addition >> though. :) > But there is nice sort command and power of unix. > Don't you remember the initial UNIX concept to make miracles by small > things fired together? :) Well, let's disable sorting in ls output totally and give this role to sort. I thinks folks won't adopt this idea, especially said that ls output isn't easily machine-parseable. -netch-