Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:16:52 +0300 From: Valentin Nechayev <netch@ivb.nn.kiev.ua> To: Andriy Tkachuk <andrit@ukr.net> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /bin/ls sorting bug? Message-ID: <20040621061652.GA96079@lucky.net> In-Reply-To: <004401c45640$f7d73b70$5f0210ac@ranger> References: <20040619175007.GB462@tuatara.fishballoon.org> <414787887.20040619210137@andric.com> <20040619193545.GC462@tuatara.fishballoon.org> <14210101.20040619220601@andric.com> <004401c45640$f7d73b70$5f0210ac@ranger>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 02:34:04, andrit wrote about "Re: /bin/ls sorting bug?": >> And AFAICS, there's no way to tell ls: "first sort on time, >> then on filename, then on size", etc. This would make a nice addition >> though. :) > But there is nice sort command and power of unix. > Don't you remember the initial UNIX concept to make miracles by small > things fired together? :) Well, let's disable sorting in ls output totally and give this role to sort. I thinks folks won't adopt this idea, especially said that ls output isn't easily machine-parseable. -netch-
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040621061652.GA96079>