From owner-freebsd-current Tue Dec 11 21:58:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f240.law8.hotmail.com [216.33.241.240]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229C737B41C; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 21:58:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 21:58:37 -0800 Received: from 209.52.193.196 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2001 05:58:37 GMT X-Originating-IP: [209.52.193.196] From: "Craig R" To: hackers@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [SUGGESTION] - JFS for FreeBSD Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 21:58:37 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Dec 2001 05:58:37.0977 (UTC) FILETIME=[0AD83890:01C182D2] Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I think I would rather see people tweaking the heck out of the existing UFS filesystem and implementing new ways of getting it to go faster. Implementing a whole new filesystem would probably take a lot of work, and the performance wouldn't be much better anyways. IMHO, people interested in making a filesystem faster should stick with UFS. FreeBSD should not do what Linux does, which is make a whole bunch of different filesystems that all suck in a different way. This is an opinion and should be taken as such, not an insult to those that like the whole JFS idea. -Craig _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message