From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr 17 10:28:31 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E43106566B;
	Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:28:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz)
Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854948FC1D;
	Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:28:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz)
Received: from localhost (localhost.codelab.cz [127.0.0.1])
	by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E608319E023;
	Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:09:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (r5bb235.net.upc.cz [86.49.61.235])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C7E7519E019;
	Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:09:51 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <49E8556F.3090505@quip.cz>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:09:51 +0200
From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
	rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: cz, cs, en, en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru
References: <200904161900.42681.oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru>	<b79ecaef0904160852r55438408u8f6e2839d2d352d0@mail.gmail.com>	<200904162016.25524.oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru>
	<200904171047.56671.oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru>
In-Reply-To: <200904171047.56671.oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: pav@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: a little confuse with case-sensitive name ports and multiple
 ports with same name
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:28:32 -0000

Oleg Ginzburg wrote:
> And i forget to say for one else problem with {archivers,mis}/deco:
> both of them produced one binary file in /usr/local/bin/deco.
> 
> cd /usr/ports/archivers/deco
> make install
> ...
> (i have deco archivers)
> pkg_add -r deco
> 
> (deco/NC-clone replace /usr/local/bin/deco)
> 
>  pkg_which /usr/local/bin/deco
> [Updating the pkgdb <format:bdb_btree> in /var/db/pkg ... - 718 packages found 
> (-1 +1) (...). done]
> deco-3.9_4 deco-1.6
> 
> pkg_delete -f deco-3.9\*

Can you open a PR for this problem? I think it is really bad. If two 
ports are installing same files, then there must be set CONFLICTS in 
Makefile.

The next thing is that I think there should not be the two ports with 
the same name.

Miroslav Lachman