From owner-freebsd-current Fri Sep 29 13:15:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (adsl-63-202-176-106.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.202.176.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B7B37B4DE for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 13:15:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e8TKGUA06256; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 13:16:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com) Message-Id: <200009292016.e8TKGUA06256@mass.osd.bsdi.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: takawata@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp Cc: Mitsuru IWASAKI , acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACPI megapatch In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 30 Sep 2000 00:38:34 +0900." <200009291538.AAA20648@libr.scitec.kobe-u.ac.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 13:16:30 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > And probe method and identify method should not be confused. > Memory area check etc.... can be in MD acpi probe code. Can you explain what you mean here a bit more? The FACT lookup and resource establishment need to be done in the identify routine, not the probe routine... -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message