From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 00:14:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5111065677 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:14:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from cpoproxy3-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy3-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.54.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5AAFC8FC1B for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:14:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18028 invoked by uid 0); 27 Jul 2010 00:14:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 27 Jul 2010 00:14:25 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=g3eXlYMJRC3OSvL6MsztmuqO1xQU6mjND2eURTxSsKMk72BbgxQ67UEwQYVhOPy1KLmUOMmsn2G+Okqpsj0y9N++nw2zZAa+qKGOeANiJ3Hy68f7a2pSKhkmYfqZ9h4E; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdXoO-0006tV-F4 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:14:25 -0600 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:12:29 -0600 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:12:29 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100727001229.GA91286@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <8B2A21F8-53F0-4392-AFB7-0ACD9A250B57@balholm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8B2A21F8-53F0-4392-AFB7-0ACD9A250B57@balholm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: BSD logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:14:26 -0000 --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 08:39:12AM -0700, Andy Balholm wrote: >=20 > It's also possible that, after reading the responses to his inquiry, > the original poster decided that his question had been adequately > answered, his concerns were justified, and he should use a different > operating system. >=20 > although the UNIX term "daemon" is not satanic in origin, some aspects > of Beastie's appearance are obviously derived from traditional > depictions of the Devil.=20 Really? Are you sure they weren't derived from something else -- perhaps a source in common for the "traditional" depictions of the devil? There may be a common source for both, rather than one being the source of the other. Correlation does not imply causation. Did you ask the original Beastie artist for confirmation that he was consciously emulating images of the Christian devil, or did you just jump to a conclusion like the OP? --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkxOJG0ACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKUI+ACdE0L+sLAyCtNkpfSjZ5FcYK9H QJ0An12Evbe2cgBkwiH5BQGQIv0syBv5 =rSJj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DocE+STaALJfprDB--