From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Dec 22 20:09:25 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BC571339AF6 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:09:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@cschubert.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A836F1CA for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:09:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@cschubert.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CB3C71339AF5; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:09:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E2C1339AF4 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:09:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@cschubert.com) Received: from smtp-out-no.shaw.ca (smtp-out-no.shaw.ca [64.59.134.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 491DC6F1C7; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:09:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@cschubert.com) Received: from spqr.komquats.com ([70.67.125.17]) by shaw.ca with ESMTPA id anaIg2ZB8MRX3anaKgPzNF; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 13:09:21 -0700 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=TL87tGta c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=VFtTW3WuZNDh6VkGe7fA3g==:117 a=VFtTW3WuZNDh6VkGe7fA3g==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=2ur7OfE09M0A:10 a=L0TlzgiqAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=eh1Yez-EAAAA:8 a=YxBL1-UpAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=FK5bYJiJP2447jQKtJoA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=h1pxpgV1WlEA:10 a=IAVDLmJhbIOVeWgv0OxI:22 a=Ia-lj3WSrqcvXOmTRaiG:22 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy [10.1.1.91]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83B5F2B4; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 12:09:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id wBMK9ISa050106; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 12:09:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com) Received: from slippy (cy@localhost) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id wBMK9H5T050103; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 12:09:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com) Message-Id: <201812222009.wBMK9H5T050103@slippy.cwsent.com> X-Authentication-Warning: slippy.cwsent.com: cy owned process doing -bs X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.7.1 Reply-to: Cy Schubert From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.cschubert.com/ To: Yuri Pankov cc: Mark Peek , Enji Cooper , Warner Losh , =?UTF-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=c3=b8rgrav?= , freebsd-current Subject: Re: workaround for VMware WS NAT bug triggered by OpenSSH 7.8p1 changes In-Reply-To: Message from Yuri Pankov of "Sat, 22 Dec 2018 21:03:26 +0300." <913730b6-c6f0-60b8-a589-e89e872b7f42@yuripv.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 12:09:17 -0800 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfO4xzWeow5AL16JIU7n9XLRXxc8swd3BuFOCzIw1ymnALAt9g5katCAVgb3yMfUBz4npRLjyRV5nISD9VTsts5LLMBX5FHcR7KZgGUnzq78VFXOPSSqF Zcu7qHN3/NcAT56WCbS/N2XlDa/upKRmgLyoCfnT03ZYl6+gAMv1dO+N1BK9EOgSmZYNYN0cvPPTjAQP9vCsUAm/QAtVk6egunO+UcQce+8cYn61ZqicOwpg KXOSOxSoFYF8aLPiSyQPxo1sWzneOpJDG+DZUolnBfD/8ql0DkSjQkKFrjxyeg4sE1jJzD02BjNBF8Bkmg39/g== X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 491DC6F1C7 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.37 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[17.125.67.70.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.11]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: spqr.komquats.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.94)[-0.943,0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[9.134.59.64.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6327, ipnet:64.59.128.0/20, country:CA]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-1.71)[ip: (-3.98), ipnet: 64.59.128.0/20(-2.50), asn: 6327(-2.00), country: CA(-0.09)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:09:25 -0000 In message <913730b6-c6f0-60b8-a589-e89e872b7f42@yuripv.net>, Yuri Pankov write s: > Yuri Pankov wrote: >> In-Reply-To: > com> >> Mark Peek wrote: >> > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 9:30 PM Enji Cooper wro= >> te: >> >=20 >> >> >> >>> On Dec 21, 2018, at 17:48, Yuri Pankov wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Mark Peek wrote: >> >>>> Thanks for the cc:. I forwarded the original report on to an interna= >> l >> >>>> VMware desktop product contact. >> >>> >> >>> Thank you. >> >>> >> >>>> What version of Workstation or Fusion is this occurring on? I saw >> >>>> Workstation 14 mentioned but curious if it occurs on Workstation 15 >> >>>> (latest). >> >>> >> >>> Running the latest available for download: 15.0.2 build-10952284. >> >> >> >> This is affecting me on VMware Fusion 11.0.1-11.0.2. I know it wasn=E2= >> =80=99t >> >> affecting me on 10.x. I didn=E2=80=99t install 11.0.0, so I don=E2=80=99= >> t know if it >> >> affects that version... >> >> >> >> Thanks so much! >> >> >> >> -Enji >> >=20 >> >=20 >> > BTW, there appears to be a workaround here using -o 'IPQoS=3Dthroughput= >> ' >> > (untested by me). I've seen the issue forwarded internally but no furth= >> er >> > discussions yet. >> >=20 >> > https://communities.vmware.com/thread/590825 > > Yes, that's exactly what the patch attached to original message does if > we are running as a VMware guest. The workaround is known and it works, > but it's not immediately clear and I just wanted it to be the default > for the time being. The patch assumes VMWARE_GUEST_WORKAROUND unconditionally. Is this intended? Juxtaposed to this, at $JOB where our VMware guests (mostly Linux and Windows) running on VMware clusters with NSX network (with plans to totally virtualize the network), we've noticed other network quirkiness, most notably with NFS between unlike O/S's, i.e. Solaris <--> Linux. I'm not surprised that this regression also exists. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.