From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 28 17:31:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B57E1065674 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:31:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2-6.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:80:80::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A3B8FC1F for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:31:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9SHVGZa071753 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:31:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from mdt-xp.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9SHVF50055238; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:31:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <201010281731.o9SHVF50055238@lava.sentex.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:31:11 -0400 To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <20101028172230.O66242@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <201010221416.o9MEGSa0094817@lava.sentex.ca> <201010221425.o9MEPcWC094867@lava.sentex.ca> <20101028172230.O66242@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 205.211.164.50 Cc: Randy Bush , stable Subject: Re: repeating crashes with 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:31:19 -0000 At 01:23 PM 10/28/2010, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Mike Tancsa wrote: > >Hi Randy, Mike, > >>At 10:18 AM 10/22/2010, Randy Bush wrote: >>> > Do you know how this panic is triggered ? Are you able to >>> > create it on demand ? >>>no i do not. bring server up and it'll happen in half an hour. >>>and the server was happy for two months. so i am thinking hardware. >> >>Perhaps. The reason I ask is that I had a box go down last night >>with the same set of errors. The box has a number of ipv6 routes, >>but its next hop was down and the problems started soon after. So I >>wonder if it has something to do with that. Do you have ipv6 on >>this box and are all the next hop addresses correct / reachable ? >> >>Oct 22 02:06:02 i4 kernel: em1: discard frame w/o packet header >>Oct 22 02:06:10 i4 kernel: em2: discard frame w/o packet header >>Oct 22 02:06:21 i4 kernel: em1: discard frame w/o packet header > >Just a shot in the dark, as I got another private report just now >on this one; is any of you by chance running VLANs on the systems >you see this happening? Hi Bjoern, On the machine that original crashed for me ? yes there are vlans on it, but the path in question was going across a native interface. But when zoo crashed, there were no vlans defined on the box at all. ---Mike