From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jun 20 10:30:02 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA26553 for current-outgoing; Thu, 20 Jun 1996 10:30:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from news1.gtn.com (news1.gtn.com [192.109.159.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA26524 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 1996 10:29:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by news1.gtn.com (8.7.2/8.7.2) id TAA09194; Thu, 20 Jun 1996 19:15:39 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by klemm.gtn.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA00438; Thu, 20 Jun 1996 19:12:15 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1996 19:12:15 +0200 (MET DST) From: Andreas Klemm To: Nate Williams cc: Chuck Robey , FreeBSD current Subject: Re: When gcc-2.7.2 hits ctm In-Reply-To: <199606201355.HAA09538@rocky.sri.MT.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 20 Jun 1996, Nate Williams wrote: > You *are* a remote developer if you're getting the CTM stuff. And, if > you can't handle the mail load of the gcc integration, un-subscribe from > CTM until it all blows over, ftp everything by hand, and when everything > is back to normal re-subscribe. That's a good way I think. Don't force the people, who have sufficiant resources to have manual extra work. If someone, and I think, too, it's the minority, has insufficiant resources, then he should do as described above ! > Everything is in your hands and Poul didn't have to do anything, and > those users who *can* handle the larger email aren't punished either. Yes yes yes ! -- andreas@klemm.gtn.com /\/\___ Wiechers & Partner Datentechnik GmbH Andreas Klemm ___/\/\/ Support Unix -- andreas.klemm@wup.de pgp p-key http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/~bal/pks-toplev.html >>> powered by <<< ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/Printing/aps-491.tgz >>> FreeBSD <<<