From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 22 09:03:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3C016A4D1 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:03:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay.rdsnet.ro (gimli.rdsnet.ro [193.231.236.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74F2C43D49 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:03:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: (qmail 14224 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2005 08:57:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.rdsnet.ro) (62.231.74.130) by smtp1-133.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 22 Mar 2005 08:57:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 20102 invoked by uid 89); 22 Mar 2005 09:10:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98) by 0 with SMTP; 22 Mar 2005 09:10:57 -0000 Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4CCE1145D; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:03:03 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:03:03 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Anton Berezin Message-ID: <20050322110303.036cd9e5@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20050322084911.GA21666@heechee.tobez.org> References: <200503210441.j2L4fQRB021246@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> <20050322084911.GA21666@heechee.tobez.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.3 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Rong-En Fan cc: Marcus Grando cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: sem@FreeBSD.org cc: Cheng-Lung Sung cc: edwin@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mail/policyd name conflict X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:03:17 -0000 On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:49:11 +0100 Anton Berezin wrote: > Hi, > > We have a PR (ports/79070) for a new port named mail/policyd, which does > the following: > > > Policyd is an anti-spam plugin for Postfix (written in C) that does > > greylisting, sender (envelope or SASL) based throttling (on messages > > and/or volume per defined time unit) and Spamtrap monitoring / > > blacklisting. > > > > Author: cami@mweb.co.za > > WWW: http://policyd.sourceforge.net/ > > clsung brought to my attention that we in fact already have a > mail/policyd port. I would imagine that typically in this situation > this would mean tough luck for the newer submission. In this instance, > however, it looks like the "policyd" name really suits the new port > better than the existing one, which is: > > This is a C port of Meng Wong's policyd for Postfix. The original > code is available from http://spf.pobox.com/postfix-policyd.txt. > It implements SPF for postfix, as a policy daemon. > > WWW: http://www.libspf2.org/ > > So, while both ports use postfix'es policy mechanism, the new port is > much broader in scope. > > So I'd like to suggest to rename the existing mail/policyd to > mail/policyd-spf, for example. So a repo for his one. > It might be a good idea to rename the new port to mail/policyd-somethingelse > anyway, if we can come up with a sufficiently descriptive (and short!) > "somethingelse" part. Supposing is w/o "something" part, what will this do to portversion (is it going to go backwards ?) and how will we protect users from self shooting by portupgrading from the old one to the new one w/o noticing ? -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"