From owner-freebsd-doc Thu Jul 20 14:40: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BD6637C14E for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 14:40:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id OAA08486; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 14:40:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 14:40:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200007202140.OAA08486@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Cc: From: Ben Smithurst Subject: Re: docs/20056: Bad SGML in the "@ sign" entry of the FAQ Reply-To: Ben Smithurst Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR docs/20056; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ben Smithurst To: Udo Erdelhoff Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/20056: Bad SGML in the "@ sign" entry of the FAQ Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 21:46:41 +0100 Udo Erdelhoff wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 04:54:56PM +0100, Ben Smithurst wrote: >>
 >>     pn=\@
 >> 
> The html-tag pre indicates preformatted text and both Netscape 4 and the > Preview 1 of Netscape 6 (I admit my sin: Yes, I'm using Windows 98, too) > indent this text. Yes. That's what I see too. >> That results from pn=\@, and I'd assume >> conversions to other formats get this right too. > > My eyes tell me a rather different story :-) About what? without the leading white space produces an indent, are you saying the other formats get this wrong? -- Ben Smithurst / ben@FreeBSD.org / PGP: 0x99392F7D FreeBSD Documentation Project / To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message