From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 19 10:39:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C8D16A412 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 10:39:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com) Received: from matrix.gatewaynet.com (host2.dynacom.ondsl.gr [62.103.35.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C71443CA2 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 10:39:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com) Received: from host3.dynacom.ondsl.gr ([62.103.35.211] helo=ip216.internal.net) by matrix.gatewaynet.com with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GwbdJ-0001Fb-M9 for freebsd-java@freebsd.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:51:37 +0200 From: Achilleas Mantzios Organization: Dynacom Tankers Mgmt To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:51:37 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <200612191141.12890.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> <20061219094541.GF1006@office.redwerk.com> In-Reply-To: <20061219094541.GF1006@office.redwerk.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612191151.37416.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 10:39:26 -0000 =CE=A3=CF=84=CE=B9=CF=82 =CE=A4=CF=81=CE=AF=CF=84=CE=B7 19 =CE=94=CE=B5=CE= =BA=CE=AD=CE=BC=CE=B2=CF=81=CE=B9=CE=BF=CF=82 2006 11:45, =CE=BF/=CE=B7 Eug= eny N Dzhurinsky =CE=AD=CE=B3=CF=81=CE=B1=CF=88=CE=B5: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:41:12AM +0200, Achilleas Mantzios wrote: > > ???????? ?????????? 19 ???????????????????? 2006 10:04, ??/?? Eugeny N= =20 Dzhurinsky ????????????: > > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:19:06AM -0800, Nick Johnson wrote: > > > > It should also be run with libthr as the > > > > threading library, as the consensus seems to be that this provides > > > > better performance than libpthread (libkse). > > > > > > Very interesting. Could you please clarify how to use libthr on > > > 5.5/6.2, will there be a need to recompile everything? > > > > no just setup /etc/libmap.conf, like > > [/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/bin/java] > > libpthread.so.2 libthr.so.2 > > Nice, is it possible to see does it really uses libthr.so.2? smth like smadev# ldd /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/bin/java /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/bin/java: libz.so.3 =3D> /lib/libz.so.3 (0x28083000) libpthread.so.2 =3D> /usr/lib/libthr.so.2 (0x28093000) libc.so.6 =3D> /lib/libc.so.6 (0x280a5000) smadev# =2D-=20 Achilleas Mantzios