From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 18 12:15:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 650F91A8 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 12:15:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EBD9F24 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 12:15:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5]) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1ICFnjn048344 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 12:15:49 GMT (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org) Received: (from root@localhost) by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t1ICFnkD048343; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 12:15:49 GMT (envelope-from root) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 12:15:49 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "hselasky (Hans Petter Selasky)" Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D1711: Changes to the callout code to restore active semantics and also add a test-framework and test to validate thecallout code (and potentially for use by other tests). Message-ID: <6fe00fbf0b80b91c8237836569fdcee5@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 Thread-Topic: D1711: Changes to the callout code to restore active semantics and also add a test-framework and test to validate the callout code (and potentially for use by other tests). X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: Y2JjMTcyODJkYzgxM2NkZDFjY2RhOGRmMTlkIFTkgnU= X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 12:15:50 -0000 hselasky added a comment. Let me re-phrase if I was unclear: I see nothing preventing the callout_reset() macro from reading (c)->c_cpu lock when it is equal to CPUBLOCK while another CPU is calling callout_cpu_switch() on the same callout. Especially in the case of a migration case done by the callout_process(), because there is no common "c->c_lock" so-to-speak for the two pieces of code. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1711 To: rrs, gnn, rwatson, lstewart, jhb, kostikbel, sbruno, imp, adrian, hselasky Cc: julian, hiren, jhb, kostikbel, emaste, delphij, neel, erj, freebsd-net