From owner-freebsd-i18n Wed Mar 21 13:19:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-i18n@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A091D37B71E; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:19:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA22140; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:19:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:19:10 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200103212119.QAA22140@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: minoura@netbsd.org (MINOURA Makoto) Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, i18n@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request for review [Re: /bin/ls patch round #2] In-Reply-To: <20010321040241.C97FC3668@203.141.142.186.user.am.il24.net> References: <20010319195438.A43266@peorth.iteration.net> <20010320002043.A46115@peorth.iteration.net> <20010320065321.E63933668@203.141.142.186.user.am.il24.net> <200103201736.MAA09185@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20010321040241.C97FC3668@203.141.142.186.user.am.il24.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-i18n@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG < Sorry I'm not sure but rune API is slightly different > between 4.4BSD and Plan9, isn't it? Nobody runs Plan 9, whereas hundreds of thousands of machines run *BSD. > Sources of the standard commands are often used as a living > textbook to other programmers. They should be as `good' as > possible, and in my opinion `good' includes `standard-complient'. You would have to exclude most of the programs in 4.4BSD by that definition. There is a reason why interfaces like err(3) and daemon(3) are included in the standard C library, and the style guide strongly recommends their usage. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-i18n" in the body of the message