From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Mar 10 01:34:13 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id BAA11355 for current-outgoing; Fri, 10 Mar 1995 01:34:13 -0800
Received: from tinny.eis.net.au (ernie@[203.12.171.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA11321 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 10 Mar 1995 01:33:37 -0800
Received: (from ernie@localhost) by tinny.eis.net.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id TAA08103 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Fri, 10 Mar 1995 19:33:01 +1000
From: Ernie Elu <ernie@tinny.eis.net.au>
Message-Id: <199503100933.TAA08103@tinny.eis.net.au>
Subject: Re SNAP or -current
To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 1995 19:33:01 +1000 (EST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 600       
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I am going to set up a FreeBSD WWW server with 8 dial in lines and a couple
of slip links to the outside word this weekend. It will be a mail and news
server (8MB of news per day currently) as well as getting a lot of PPP and 
slip use.

What is the most stable FreeBSD version from 2.0 onwards that I should be
using?

- Ernie.
_______________________________________________________________________________
              ernie@tinny.apana.org.au  Brisbane - Australia
                       "I ping, therefore I am." 
_______________________________________________________________________________