From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr  2 08:26:14 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9FC106566C;
	Fri,  2 Apr 2010 08:26:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from randy@psg.com)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE06F8FC16;
	Fri,  2 Apr 2010 08:26:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rmac.psg.com.psg.com)
	by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <randy@psg.com>)
	id 1NxcCk-0000YN-Gq; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 08:26:14 +0000
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 17:26:13 +0900
Message-ID: <m2eiiymfa2.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100401222404.77a14a02.stas@FreeBSD.org>
References: <4BB51B5B.1050606@FreeBSD.org>
	<20100401222404.77a14a02.stas@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>,
	freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Results of BIND RFC
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 08:26:15 -0000

> While it certainly might make sense to drop BIND out of the base, I'm not
> sure dropping bind tools as well from it is the best decision.  How hard
> it will be to continue maintaining bind tools inside the base (so the 
> critical ones like dig and nslookup still will be available), while moving
> the rest of it (the server itself and supporting tools) to the port?

i don't mind if dig, doc, et alia are not in base, as long as they are a
separate port from the bind hippo.

randy