From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Sep 18 04:02:41 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id EAA04717
          for ports-outgoing; Wed, 18 Sep 1996 04:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA04690
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 1996 04:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.7.5/8.6.9) id EAA16274; Wed, 18 Sep 1996 04:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 04:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199609181102.EAA16274@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: sysseh@devetir.qld.gov.au
CC: ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199609181055.KAA06609@netfl15a.devetir.qld.gov.au> (message from Stephen Hocking on Wed, 18 Sep 1996 20:55:47 +1000)
Subject: Re: new category: astro
From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * I'd further separate the astrology & astronomy stuff, since one's a science 
 * and the other, welllll......

I thought about that too (mind you, I don't care about astrology at
all, I even objected astrolog joining the now-defunct "utililities"
category :), but I thought there probably won't be enough ports there
to warrant a new category if we limit it to the science of astronomy
only.  (If we want to include xasteroid, we sure can't exclude
astrolog....)

Satoshi