From owner-freebsd-current Sat Mar 3 23:35:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from meer.meer.net (meer.meer.net [209.245.148.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B52A37B718 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 23:35:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from neville-neil.com (unknown-35-202.wrs.com [147.11.35.202]) by meer.meer.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/meer) with ESMTP id XAA3426892; Sat, 3 Mar 2001 23:35:36 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200103040735.XAA3426892@meer.meer.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Julian Elischer Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Getting a first build up and running? In-Reply-To: Message from Julian Elischer of "Sat, 03 Mar 2001 21:02:41 PST." <3AA1CC71.8F6FF340@elischer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2001 23:35:34 -0800 From: "George V. Neville-Neil" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > The click router was designed around he same time as netgraph with many of the > same design goals, except they wanted to make it slightly less lego than I did. > > It is interesting how many common ideas came up but also how many differences > As one of the designers of netgraph I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on the comparison. I've looked at both but only played with netgraph a little. Having read the major papers on Click I think it's an excellent way to build highly extensible, field upgradable, fast routers. I guess we'll see of course :-) Later, George To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message