Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 22:54:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Nick Hibma <hibma@skylink.it> To: Pascal Hofstee <daeron@Wit401305.student.utwente.nl> Cc: Doug <Doug@gorean.org>, Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909012253520.7489-100000@heidi.plazza.it> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909012249510.12931-100000@shadowmere.student.utwente.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Why not do this as part of the port itself, ala majordomo? That > > works just fine and is completely non-controversial because you don't get > > it unless you ask for it. > > I would just liek to point out that Postfix is also doing the exact same > thing ... user postfix ... (as well as a group maildrop) Maybe a stupid question, but how do you figure out which uid is still available, if you don't want every port to include a UID scanning utility? Nick -- e-Mail: hibma@skylink.it To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9909012253520.7489-100000>