From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 16 06:56:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A18F16A4CE for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:56:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from brisefer.cediti.be (porquepix.cediti.be [213.189.188.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9843943D1D for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:56:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Olivier.Cherrier@cediti.be) Received: by brisefer.nat.cediti.be with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:54:52 +0100 Message-ID: From: Olivier Cherrier To: "'dimitry@al.org.ua'" , freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:54:45 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: RE: Anybody Use 2 or More CPU at Production Env. ( SMP ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 14:56:38 -0000 >> Not so luck for me. >> I tried some times to run a 4.7-smp and 4.8-smp on a dual >PIII - 733 MHz >> but I always falled in >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/48029 >> which is still in the 'open' state. >> >> I can imagine that 5.x is far more stable. > >imho you have a problem with hardware (for ex. different CPUs stepping) I can not check anymore because it is not my own hardware. But before, the box ran perfectly with a Linux-SMP on it. oc