From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Mar 21 11:16:15 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from phoenix.volant.org (phoenix.volant.org [205.179.79.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1242514E3A for ; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 11:16:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from patl@phoenix.volant.org) Received: from asimov.phoenix.volant.org ([205.179.79.65]) by phoenix.volant.org with smtp (Exim 1.92 #8) id 10OnhS-00007G-00; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 11:15:54 -0800 Received: from localhost by asimov.phoenix.volant.org (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id LAA16088; Sun, 21 Mar 1999 11:15:48 -0800 Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 11:15:48 -0800 (PST) From: patl@phoenix.volant.org Reply-To: patl@phoenix.volant.org Subject: Re: GNOME To: Alex Zepeda Cc: Jacques Vidrine , Dan Moschuk , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Perhaps I picked some bad ports, gmc and balsa. gmc needed a little > tweaking (of the patches?!) to get itself built, and works as well as > expcted (it doesn't). Balsa OTOH wouldn't even compile. It seems to be > wanting version 0.4.9?!? the latest version available from www.balsa.net > was 0.4.6.2... even after telling it to depend on Gtk+ 1.2 it wouldn't > build. I'm not quite sure what the maintainer was thinking here. The balsa.net Web site appears to be a bit out of date. I found the balsa 0.4.9 tarball in ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/ It built and ran fine for me. -Pat To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message