Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 15:49:08 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org, Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> Subject: Re: OpenSSH, PAM and kerberos Message-ID: <226539732.20130903154908@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <86d2oquopo.fsf@nine.des.no> References: <86sixrwdcv.fsf@nine.des.no> <20130830131455.GW3796@zxy.spb.ru> <8661uj9lc6.fsf@nine.des.no> <20130902181754.GD3796@zxy.spb.ru> <867geywdfc.fsf@nine.des.no> <20130903083301.GF3796@zxy.spb.ru> <86y57euu8y.fsf@nine.des.no> <20130903093756.GG3796@zxy.spb.ru> <86ppsqutw7.fsf@nine.des.no> <998724759.20130903142637@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20130903103922.GI3796@zxy.spb.ru> <6110257289.20130903145034@serebryakov.spb.ru> <86d2oquopo.fsf@nine.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Dag-Erling. You wrote 3 =D1=81=D0=B5=D0=BD=D1=82=D1=8F=D0=B1=D1=80=D1=8F 2013 =D0=B3., = 15:30:43: >> des@ suggests to have ability to pass env variables from authorization >> daemon, but anyway, pam_setcred() should be called by shell process >> (or its parent), and not any process in system, am I right? DES> Everything pam_setcred() does can be done in a separate process, and t= he DES> result returned to the application using sendmsg(). Why do we need separate daemon for it? Why it could not be built-in to sshd itself? One more daemon -- one more point of failure... --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?226539732.20130903154908>