From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec  7 06:29:57 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id ECA5216A4CE; Tue,  7 Dec 2004 06:29:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3596843D69; Tue,  7 Dec 2004 06:29:57 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iB76TrT6098422;
	Tue, 7 Dec 2004 07:29:53 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog@FreeBSD.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 07 Dec 2004 09:33:09 +1030."
             <20041206230309.GN92212@wantadilla.lemis.com> 
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 07:29:53 +0100
Message-ID: <98421.1102400993@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
cc: arch@FreeBSD.org
cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] IPX and NWFS to be killed in -current. 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 06:29:58 -0000

In message <20041206230309.GN92212@wantadilla.lemis.com>, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey"
 writes:


>Why don't you leave that kind of decision to the people who run the
>project?  Your intentions appear to be at variance with those of the
>two members of core who have responded.

That is a refreshingly easy question to answer:  because core has time
and again said that they prefer to act on specific requests.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.