Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 02:08:43 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 211682] net/omnitty: Add abililty to "toggle" tagged machines Message-ID: <bug-211682-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211682 Bug ID: 211682 Summary: net/omnitty: Add abililty to "toggle" tagged machines Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: david@catwhisker.org CC: david@catwhisker.org Created attachment 173429 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D173429&action= =3Dedit Patch containing declaration of machmgr_toggle_tag_all() function I use net/omnitty a fair bit, often with fairly large lists of machines. I often need to do "something" to about half the machines, then do "somethi= ng else" to the other half. So I came up with a hack to toggle the "tagged" status of the machines. This is implemented by means of the F1 menu; I added the command characters= "o" and "O" for this purpose. (I was going to use "x" and "X", but "X" is alre= ady in use. If someone else has a better/more mnemonic code letters to use... well, I'm in favor!) Anyway, drop the attached patchfiles into the files/ subdirectory, then make the port as usual. I went ahead and separated the patchfiles, as I underst= and that it's traditional to have a separate patchfile for each port file that's being patched, even though they collectively implement a single function. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-211682-13>