From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 12 20:39:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9673216A4CF for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 20:39:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp800.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp800.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.168.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3154C43D46 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 20:39:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krinklyfig@spymac.com) Received: from unknown (HELO smogmonster.com) (jtinnin@pacbell.net@64.173.27.163 with login) by smtp800.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Feb 2005 20:39:13 -0000 From: Joshua Tinnin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:39:11 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <467538167.20050211234639@wanadoo.fr> <491919829.20050212110744@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <491919829.20050212110744@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502121239.12355.krinklyfig@spymac.com> cc: Anthony Atkielski Subject: Re: Please don't change Beastie to another crap logo such asNetBSD!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 20:39:13 -0000 On Saturday 12 February 2005 02:07 am, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Ted Mittelstaedt writes: > > The committers do know about this and are careful about it. You > > will note that this is discussed more fully here: > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributing/co > >ntrib- how.html > > > > under the section: > > > > New Code or Major Value-Added Packages > > > > I am very surprised that you missed this. Could it be made any > > more obvious? > > Yes, it could be made about a thousand times more obvious. It should > be right on the first page of the site, not buried in the > documentation. > > And it is still a bit worrisome, because it says "When working with > large amounts of code, the touchy subject of copyrights also > invariably comes up." Unfortunately, copyright applies to small > amounts of code, too, not just large amounts. Even a few lines can > lead to litigation if the copyright status of those lines is not > verified and cleared before they are incorporated into the product. I think it's great that you're volunteering to do this. Keep us updated on your status! - jt