From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 16 14:18:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48CF6106566C for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:18:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigknife-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:75::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E2A88FC19 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:18:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C918B945; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:18:03 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Konstantin Belousov Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:59:29 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p10; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <4F775DF5.1020704@rawbw.com> <4F8A8CD2.5020103@rawbw.com> <20120415093029.GR2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20120415093029.GR2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201204160959.29089.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:18:03 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Yuri , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there any modern alternative to pstack? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:18:04 -0000 On Sunday, April 15, 2012 5:30:29 am Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 01:54:42AM -0700, Yuri wrote: > > On 04/05/2012 07:06, John Baldwin wrote: > > >In this case we probably should become the upstream maintainer. My patch > > >actually bumps the version to 1.3 as it is sort of intended to do that. > > > > bsd-pstack on SourceForge is dead. Sole project owner isn't responsive, > > and as per SF policy they don't allow anyone to take over such project. > > They suggest to fork. > > So will you object if I create a new project on SF, say bsd-pstack-new, > > will import the current source and apply your patch and make a release? > > I will also update pstack port so that it will become current. > It seems that the license is two-clause BSD. > My opinion is that such tool should be imported into the base. I'm fine with putting it into the base. If so, we should import 1.2 first I think and then apply the 1.3 patch. -- John Baldwin