From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat May  4 23:17:16 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id XAA18510
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 4 May 1996 23:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (avalon@cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.76.24])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA16227
          for <FreeBSD-hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 4 May 1996 23:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199605050613.XAA16227@freefall.freebsd.org>
Received: by cheops.anu.edu.au
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA148166671; Sun, 5 May 1996 16:11:11 +1000
From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>
Subject: Re: IPv8 Tutorial #1: Minimal IPv8 hack
To: imp@village.org (Warner Losh)
Date: Sun, 5 May 1996 16:11:11 +1000 (EST)
Cc: FreeBSD-hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199605050604.AAA23919@rover.village.org> from "Warner Losh" at May 5, 96 00:04:18 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In some mail from Warner Losh, sie said:
> 
> : Protocol numbers aren't there to be chosen lightly, they should be
> : registered with the IANA first, before use.
> 
> That's why I said before that he's Co-opted the name.  He's said
> before here that the IANA or IETF isn't involved with his scheme.

Given this, I'd advise against putting hacks for IPv8 in any FreeBSD
distribution.  It's simply not a good idea, IMHO.