From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Mar 27 12:00:06 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA22134
          for questions-outgoing; Wed, 27 Mar 1996 12:00:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (palmer.demon.co.uk [158.152.50.150])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA22120
          for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 27 Mar 1996 12:00:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	  by palmer.demon.co.uk (8.6.11/8.6.11) with SMTP id TAA25390
	  ; Wed, 27 Mar 1996 19:58:48 GMT
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG
From: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: User PPP 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 27 Mar 1996 10:41:40 MST."
             <199603271741.KAA01512@phaeton.artisoft.com> 
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 19:58:47 +0000
Message-ID: <25388.827956727@palmer.demon.co.uk>
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Terry Lambert wrote in message ID
<199603271741.KAA01512@phaeton.artisoft.com>:
> > Unless you have multiple TCP/IP enabled interfaces on your machine,
> > running routed in active mode is a waste of bandwidth, and can cause
> > iijppp to unnecessarily dial out unless you add port 513 to the dial
> > filter rules.

> Shouldn't the dial filter rules contain this by default?

There is a sample config file which has port 513 blocked for dialing
out, but that is not to say that the user will use that sample config
file... (there are multiple example files showing different setups,
and only one has any filters)

Gary