Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 02:17:34 +0100 From: Christian Brueffer <chris@unixpages.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic: _mtx_lock_sleep: recursed on non-recursive mutex bpf2 @ /usr/home/build/src/sys/net/bpf.c:1119 Message-ID: <20050209011734.GB77038@unixpages.org> In-Reply-To: <20050209011047.GA86464@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050209010830.GA77038@unixpages.org> <20050209011047.GA86464@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 05:10:47PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:08:30AM +0100, Christian Brueffer wrote: > > I'm getting this reproducible panic with a 5-STABLE system based on > > sources from yesterday. The machine in question is an i386 SMP box. > >=20 > > The panic is reproducible by running an updated version of the > > security/scanssh port which is based on libevent. > >=20 > > A crashdump is available for further investigation. >=20 > Is the kernel compiled with -O2? This confuses the gdb stack trace > unwinder, so you should try instead with -O. >=20 No, it's compiled with -O. Could a custom CPUTYPE have anything to do with that? - Christian --=20 Christian Brueffer chris@unixpages.org brueffer@FreeBSD.org GPG Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCCWSubHYXjKDtmC0RAovRAJ0fL5OFGJyYXG1lNQchVWIg2WYdvwCgnQPO 0+HonYuuohffK3XpCRGJmbs= =hYL+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050209011734.GB77038>