From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sat Aug 21 22: 0: 6 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4BC914D91
	for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 22:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id WAA73366;
	Sat, 21 Aug 1999 22:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 22:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199908220500.WAA73366@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Tim Vanderhoek <tim@ppp18344.on.bellglobal.com>
Subject: Re: bin/11051: ps's -U option should accept a list%2
Reply-To: Tim Vanderhoek <tim@ppp18344.on.bellglobal.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR bin/11051; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Tim Vanderhoek <tim@ppp18344.on.bellglobal.com>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu
Cc:  
Subject: Re: bin/11051: ps's -U option should accept a list%2
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 00:59:19 -0400 (EDT)

 >
 >        I found myself wanting:
 >
 >                $ ps -Uftp,cvsup -opid,state,command
 
 Making ps accept multiple -U options strikes me as a little more
 intuitive.
 
 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message