From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 29 17:29:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D7616A402 for ; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 17:29:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from laszlof@vonostingroup.com) Received: from ritamari.vonostingroup.com (ritamari.vonostingroup.com [216.144.193.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E796F43D45 for ; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 17:29:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from laszlof@vonostingroup.com) Received: from c-71-227-92-22.hsd1.mi.comcast.net ([71.227.92.22] helo=[192.168.0.2]) by ritamari.vonostingroup.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FZtFc-000Hb0-8w; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:29:00 -0400 Message-ID: <4453A253.1020806@vonostingroup.com> Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:28:51 -0400 From: Frank Laszlo User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Larry Rosenman References: <008c01c66ac7$91e72a80$aa0610ac@aus.pervasive.com> In-Reply-To: <008c01c66ac7$91e72a80$aa0610ac@aus.pervasive.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ritamari.vonostingroup.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - vonostingroup.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PR: ports/96142 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 17:29:06 -0000 Larry Rosenman wrote: > Can I get an opinion on getting PR ports/96142 either committed or rejected? > > It's just a simple ports/UPDATING update. > > Thanks! > Larry Rosenman > > Hello, I'm not really sure a change like this warrants a modification of UPDATING. Does it adversely affect current users of the port? (or ports depending on it) How I look at it is it simply adds a shared library and wont affect current installations and upgrading. Unless of course you know something I don't. :) I commiter will probably chime in and let you know the "official" verdict. Hope that helps. -Frank