From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 09:33:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD7616A4BF; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 09:33:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-107-253.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.107.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A5C43FDF; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 09:33:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CD766B60; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 09:33:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 92A0D955; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 09:33:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 09:33:23 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20030902163323.GA45402@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030830025225.D15016@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <20030830213603.GP41860@freebsd.org.ru> <20030830144152.O21642@znfgre.qbhto.arg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030830144152.O21642@znfgre.qbhto.arg> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: "Sergey A. Osokin" cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/netpbm Makefile (fwd) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 16:33:27 -0000 --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 02:43:01PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: >=20 > > Please tell me where is my fault. >=20 > Sorry I wasn't clear.... I'm not saying you did anything wrong. I'm > saying that the general attitude around here of, "I farted, so I better > bump portrevision" is silly, and wasting a lot of people's time. >=20 The rule is "when the package changes significantly". Fixing a broken pkg-plist is significant, because the unfixed port will leave cruft behind on the system, which is unfriendly. As always, you have the option of when to upgrade your ports. If you have your own criteria for what constitutes an important change, you can rebuild your ports accordingly. Indeed, blindly running 'portupgrade -a' is generally discouraged on several grounds. Kris --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/VMZTWry0BWjoQKURAqOdAJ9etdXpThHoaa8qcyEJQLMALVXuewCfUkxu C0nYPop5o6Zv2rmYFmKWGlY= =usDk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e--