From nobody Tue Oct 22 14:59:28 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XXwMY1Rbhz5PYyw for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 15:00:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ccfreebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-f176.google.com (mail-lj1-f176.google.com [209.85.208.176]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "WR4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XXwMX2R9pz4FVC for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 15:00:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ccfreebsd@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by mail-lj1-f176.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2fb4df8d0baso2798441fa.0 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:00:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1729609206; x=1730214006; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=QinzadyT7IRqw9vl7aRXodTScUbSLjvweMQvrfR0tI0=; b=B6d0W3eCXPCtzxBhep3Q6iSqB23v1dLdGI0DWmY0XOngO+EJu7/fXcyK777Tbvh00n IT7+NzOU+XXTHNpz9A8WzVbNWvyLFptC1j/umsGimxT42woxqSHCi2Bxq5yLpPP7JppP tLotNYX1aiR1rlzmEtO8HMc2Jz9o1QNqxBh911LwSfk3QYqDFIxfmAFgKBfnvTaH37ef rmd7RJvixJ/r6AlvGs9RYIVqm0MpN/XAdT+/NK9SUHwsXEelVf85LhBcVg+36kwva5dM Gn1c6SahZ3fZa7VuC0zVkjZtOa7YvexukefJl2VXVQ9m2t4me/xVREGqm+zdXWISTY5Q Ggtw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy1NTWI6xu15rzTKd/rQdzDPlFZ2Vui04BHJ0UQn2dcvzsrM7Xr fnHRm0QlKa2RoOUiWHsZlKUR0j0/7PUKtUK2FwUogfkaNHF/pEyc3L9jgPF9 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHGYFqHiTcRxfDGzLJVJyC/Z60RlPjl2XqH4yAU+avTGmD46zqy2O/EdmKxsfMWeUObZo6qXg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:19a7:b0:2f7:7f76:992f with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2fb82eab6c4mr26089071fa.6.1729609205637; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:00:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf1-f44.google.com (mail-lf1-f44.google.com. [209.85.167.44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 38308e7fff4ca-2fb9ae100d5sm8076941fa.108.2024.10.22.08.00.05 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:00:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-f44.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-539e4488012so732957e87.1 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:00:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:ea0:b0:53a:415:d33b with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-53a154a84d6mr2265000e87.10.1729609205139; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:00:05 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Cheng Cui Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 10:59:28 -0400 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Performance test for CUBIC in stable/14 To: void Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000045e46c0625120650" X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4XXwMX2R9pz4FVC X-Spamd-Bar: ---- --00000000000045e46c0625120650 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 2:25=E2=80=AFPM void wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 10:42:49AM -0400, Cheng Cui wrote: > >Change the subject to `Performance test for CUBIC in stable/14`, was `Re= : > >Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge`. > > > >I actually prepared two patches, one depends on the other: > > > >https://reviews.freebsd.org/D47218 << apply this patch firstly > >https://reviews.freebsd.org/D47213 << apply this patch secondly > > > >Please let me know if you have any questions. > > Hi, > > What version (git -C /usr/src rev-list --count --first-parent HEAD) did y= ou > patch? > It was based on the latest stable/14 branch @commit 025535f94525. Or your command returns this: # git -C /usr/src rev-list --count --first-parent HEAD 269221 > I installed > FreeBSD-14.1-STABLE-amd64-20241017-d36ba3989ca9-269125-disc1.iso and > then updated the sources with git before checking out stable/14 which is > n269252, applying the patches and building/installing kernel from there. > > What's the exact iperf command you're using please? I'm using > > # iperf --time 60 -c 192.168.1.232 > > This is ok. I used iperf3. but I'm not sure [see note a] if that one would give comparable tests to > yours. > > Please re-organize your test result in before/after patch order. So that = I can understand and compare them. -- Best Regards, Cheng Cui --00000000000045e46c0625120650 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 2:25=E2=80=AF= PM void <void@f-m.fm> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 10:42:49AM -0400, Cheng Cui wr= ote:
>Change the subject to `Performance test for CUBIC in stable/14`, was `R= e:
>Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge`.
>
>I actually prepared two patches, one depends on the other:
>
>https://reviews.freebsd.org/D47218=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<= < apply this patch firstly
>https://reviews.freebsd.org/D47213=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<= < apply this patch secondly
>
>Please let me know if you have any questions.

Hi,

What version (git -C /usr/src rev-list --count --first-parent HEAD) did you=
patch?
It was based on the latest stable/14 branch @commit= 025535f94525.
Or your command returns this= :
# git -C /usr/src rev-list --count --firs= t-parent HEAD
269221


I installed FreeBSD-14.1-STABLE-amd64-20241017-d36ba3989ca9-269125-disc1.is= o and
then updated the sources with git before checking out stable/14 which is n269252, applying the patches and building/installing kernel from there.
What's the exact iperf command you're using please? I'm using
# iperf --time 60 -c 192.168.1.232

This is ok. I used iperf3.

but I'm not sure [see note a] if that one would give comparable tests t= o yours.

Please re-organize your test result in before/after p= atch order. So that I can understand
and compare them.
= =C2=A0
--
Best Regards,
Cheng Cui
--00000000000045e46c0625120650--