Date: Sat, 10 May 1997 12:43:05 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, announce@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: A 3.0-current SNAP building machine has been found! Message-ID: <199705101943.MAA04327@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <18077.863238129@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at May 9, 97 09:22:09 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I suppose that Terry will now suggest some sort of voting system and I > can't even say that it's such a bad idea (just so long as I don't have > to write the vote collection and tabulation software :-). > > Comments? I was actually against using "voting"; I prefer forcing developers to verify that compiles work and the resulting code does not trivially fail prior to it being committed. That way the tree would always work; the best you can get out of "voting" is "provided with high confidence that it might work". Anyway, my comments. Regards, Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199705101943.MAA04327>