From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Jun 10 18:29:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from smtp11.bellglobal.com (smtp11.bellglobal.com [204.101.251.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFBA15326 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 1999 18:29:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vanderh@ecf.toronto.edu) Received: from localhost.nowhere (Hamilton-ppp44822.sympatico.ca [206.172.76.15]) by smtp11.bellglobal.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA23696; Thu, 10 Jun 1999 21:32:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from tim@localhost) by localhost.nowhere (8.9.3/8.9.1) id VAA03596; Thu, 10 Jun 1999 21:29:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tim) Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 21:29:45 -0400 From: Tim Vanderhoek To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: "Ronald F. Guilmette" , freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/11987: vacation(1) documentation and error logging both suck Message-ID: <19990610212945.A3398@mad> References: <19990610183419.B1476@mad> <84942.929055712@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i In-Reply-To: <84942.929055712@axl.noc.iafrica.com>; from Sheldon Hearn on Fri, Jun 11, 1999 at 01:01:52AM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Jun 11, 1999 at 01:01:52AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > Alternatively, and this is what I think would be best, scrap > .vacation.log and write to stderr. It's easy enough to redirect to a > file from .forward -- I'll even supply an example in the manpage. This I like that far more than anything else suggested. > Well it won't be me doing the commit; check avail. :-) Man, you really got gyped. ;-) There's a rumour going around that it's actually possible to commit without being in the avail file. Talk to Robert Baron for more info. ;-) > Well, there's no mention of _why_ they grok Return-Path. I checked their > commit message and couldn't find "vacation" and "Return-Path" in the > same message on _any_ of their searchable mailing list archives. Who knows. It really only matters for the cases where From: and Return-Path: are different. I suppose it's probably correct to take the Return-Path: .... WTF is strlcpy()? (RFC 822: Return-Path: "definitive ... route back to the message's originator" From: "the identity of the person who wished this message to be sent." ) -- This is my .signature which gets appended to the end of my messages. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message